The roles of retribution and utility in determining punishment
نویسنده
چکیده
Three studies examined the motives underlying people’s desire to punish. In previous research, participants have read hypothetical criminal scenarios and assigned “fair” sentences to the perpetrators. Systematic manipulations within these scenarios revealed high sensitivity to factors associated with motives of retribution, but low sensitivity to utilitarian motives. This research identiWes the types of information that people seek when punishing criminals, and explores how diVerent types of information aVect punishments and conWdence ratings. Study 1 demonstrated that retribution information is more relevant to punishment than either deterrence or incapacitation information. Study 2 traced the information that people actually seek when punishing others and found a consistent preference for retribution information. Finally, Study 3 conWrmed that retribution information increases participant conWdence in assigned punishments. The results thus provide converging evidence that people punish primarily on the basis of retribution. © 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
منابع مشابه
توجیه مجازات: بررسی یک نظریه ترکیبی
There has been a longstanding battleground on the justification of Punishment with two persistent worriers Retributivism and Utilitarianism. The endless controversies of philosophers illustrate that both of theories have met the fatal criticisms and neither can provide a proper answer to the question of “Why Punish?”. As a solution, some tried to reconstruct their favorite theory, while some ot...
متن کاملJoseph de Maistre and Retributionist Theology
Joseph de Maistre is usually portrayed as Edmund Burke’s French counterpart, as they both wrote important treatises against the French Revolution. Although Maistre did share many of Burke’s conservative political views, he was much more than a political thinker. He was above all a religious thinker who interpreted political events through the prism of a particular retributionist theology. Accor...
متن کاملCorrigendum: Free Will and Punishment: A Mechanistic View of Human Nature Reduces Retribution.
Original article: Shariff, A. F., Greene, J. D., Karremans, J. C., Luguri, J. B., Clark, C. J., Schooler, J. W., . . . Vohs, K. D. (2014). Free will and punishment: A mechanistic view of human nature reduces retribution. Psychological Science, 25, 1563-1570. doi:10.1177/0956797614534693.
متن کاملCognitive Neuroscience
. . . Advances [in cognitive neuroscience] have breathed new life into very old arguments about human agency, moral responsibility, and the proper ends of criminal punishment. A prominent group of cognitive neuroscientists, joined by sympathetic philosophers, lawyers, and social scientists, have drawn upon the tools of their discipline in an effort to embarrass, discredit, and ultimately overth...
متن کاملCybercrime and Punishment: An Analysis of the Deontological and Utilitarian Functions of Punishment in the Information Age
This conceptual piece analyzes the role of criminal punishment and the nature of cyber crime to investigate whether the current punishment schemes are appropriate given the deontological and utilitarian goals of punishment: retribution, deterrence, incapacitation, and rehabilitation. The research has implications for policymaking in cybercriminal law.
متن کامل